Harvard Study Links Hormone Therapy Drugs to Strokes

Prempro Linked To Strokes Drug Toxic Chemicals

Free Case Evaluation From An Experienced Drug Liability Attorney.

Harvard Study Links Hormone Therapy Drugs to Strokes

A recent Harvard School of Public Health study shows that women who used estrogen hormone therapy
had a 40% higher risk of suffering from a stroke than those who did not use a hormone therapy –
confirming the results of a previous study that showed similar results.

Details of the study

The study, conducted by the Harvard School of Public Health and published in the American
Medical Association’s Archives of Internal Medicine, analyzed data from over 121,000 women
(described as younger, recently menopausal and older women ages 30 – 55) from a Nurses’ Health
Study that began in 1976 and completed in 2004. The results showed that:

Women who used estrogen hormone therapy had a 40 percent higher risk of suffering from a
stroke than women who did not use hormone therapy drugs.

Women who used a combination of estrogen and progestin hormone therapy had an additional 27
percent higher risk of suffering from a stroke.

Results mirror previous study

A previous study conducted by the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) looked at the hormone therapy
drugs Prempro and Premarin, both manufactured by Wyeth Pharmaceuticals. Researchers studied over
15,000 women and found 24% more cancers among women who took these hormone replacement therapy
drugs versus a placebo. However, that study was never officially completed due to increased risks
of heart disease, stroke and breast cancer.

100,000 plus victims

Bryan Aylstock, a Florida attorney whose firm protects the rights of consumers who are
seriously injured due to hormone replacement therapy drugs, says that the potential victims that
have been causally diagnosed with breast cancer related to their hormone replacement therapy is
staggering – probably in excess of 100,000. However, the number of cases actually filed is only
around 5,000. He explained why, “There’s a large population of people out there who still
probably don’t know that their use of this combination hormone replacement therapy could have
caused their breast cancer. I think it’s important for them to know that fact.”

If you or a loved one has been injured due to the use a hormone replacement therapy drug,
contact an attorney to discuss your situation. The consultation is free, without obligation and
strictly confidential. To contact a qualified attorney whose practice focuses in this area of the
law, please click here. We may be able
to help.

Read more for related video clips.

Continue reading “Harvard Study Links Hormone Therapy Drugs to Strokes”

New or old laws?

Computer Laws Computer Law Intellectual Property

New or old laws?

While new laws are constantly being debated to regulate computers and computing activities, these laws are not being created in a vacuum. Basic legal principles – derived from established common, statutory and case law authority – and common sense– all help form the basis of the law in this field. Current law is used to resolve controversies whenever there is no specific law with respect to a disputed computer or computer related activity; and many of the “new” disputes are just repeats of patterns seen before (forgery existed before either digital photo morphing or “identity theft”). New laws are created either when a problem appears to need a general solution that isn’t as easily provided by (relatively) sparse judicial decisions, or when businesses and the public will benefit from knowing what the “rules of the road” will be beforehand, so they can predict the effects of their actions. The pace of change is increasing in the law, just as in all other areas where computers are involved — perhaps because even the lawyers and judges are beginning to find how valuable the computering “tool” can be.

With respect to computers and related activities – you can get an old (law) dog to do new tricks – just as long as you can reasonably predict his new behavior when he’s moving at hyperspeed!

Read more to view related video clips.

Continue reading “New or old laws?”

Jury Hits Wyeth with $99 Million in Punitive Damages

Prempro Punitive Damages Drug Toxic Chemicals

Free Case Evaluation From An Experienced Drug Liability Attorney.

Jury Hits Wyeth with $99 Million in Punitive Damages

The Nevada jury that found Wyeth Pharmaceuticals liable for $134.5 million to three women who developed breast cancer after taking drugs manufactured by the company, has now hit Wyeth with a $99 million punitive damages award.View All Prempro Articles

The original case
The Nevada lawsuit was brought by three women who developed breast cancer after taking Wyeth’s hormone replacement drugs and Premarin and Prempro. The women alleged that the pharmaceutical giant did not provide adequate warnings and the three developed breast cancer as a result.
While the jury originally awarded the women $134.5 million in damages, that amount was later reduced by approximately $99 million as the jury mistakenly thought that punitive damages were included in the original amount. To show Wyeth that they should pay punitive damages (which are meant to ‘punish’), the jury simply awarded punitive damages in almost the same amount that had been reduced.
Premarin & Prempro
Premarin, which is an estrogen replacement drug, and Prempro, which is a combination of estrogen and progestin, were both found to be defective products by the Nevada jury, who also found Wyeth negligent in producing, marketing and selling these drugs.
In addition to breast cancer, both drugs have been associated with other types of cancer in women. Wyeth continues to fight over 5,000 similar lawsuits nationwide.
If you or a love one has been injured by taking Prempro or Premarin, contact an attorney to evaluate your case.
Suffered harm from Prempro? You may have a lawsuit. Click here, for a top rated law firm to evaluate your legal rights.

Read more for related video clips.

Continue reading “Jury Hits Wyeth with $99 Million in Punitive Damages”

Nevada Jury Finds Wyeth’s Prempro Liable For $135 Million

Prempro Lawsuit 135 Million Drug Toxic Chemicals

Free Case Evaluation From An Experienced Drug Liability Attorney.

Nevada Jury Finds Wyeth’s Prempro Liable For $135 Million

October 11, 2007. A Nevada jury found Wyeth Pharmaceuticals liable for over $135 million on Wednesday in a lawsuit brought by three women who developed breast cancer after taking Wyeth’s hormone replacement drugs and Premarin and Prempro. View All Prempro Articles

Over 5,000 lawsuits filed already

Premarin, an estrogen replacement drug, and Prempro, a combination of estrogen and progestin, were found to be defective products by the jury, who also found Wyeth negligent in producing, marketing and selling the drugs. According to reports, this is the fourth lawsuit that Wyeth has lost in litigation over the drugs and is currently fighting over 5,000 similar lawsuits across the country. Wednesday’s verdict in Nevada is good news for the over 7,500 women involved in those lawsuits.

$135.5 million awarded to three plaintiffs

Although Wyeth claimed that they provided adequate warnings on the products’ labels after undergoing detailed studies, the jury simply did not agree and awarded all three plaintiffs $7.5 million in past damages and $36 million to two of the women ($40 million to the third) for future damages. The court will reportedly decide whether or not to award punitive damages to the plaintiffs later this week.

If you have been injured by taking Prempro or Premarin, contact an attorney to evaluate your case. To contact an attorney near you whose practice focuses in this area, click here.

Read more for related video clips.

Continue reading “Nevada Jury Finds Wyeth’s Prempro Liable For $135 Million”

Hiring a Prempro Attorney and Lawyer

Prempro Lawyer Drug Toxic Chemicals

Free Case Evaluation From An Experienced Drug Liability Attorney.

Hiring a Prempro Attorney and Lawyer

Have you suffered any of the serious side effects from hormone replacement therapy (HRT) after taking Prempro? If so, you may be able to get damages for your injuries. You should begin by having your case evaluated by a Prempro attorney who is experienced in pharmaceutical litigation. A qualified Prempro lawyer will be able to tell you how good a case you have and what kind of damages you might be able to collect. You need to get your case to an attorney as soon as you can, because each state has a limit on the amount of time you have to bring such litigation. You need to comply with your state’s statute of limitations, or you will lose your claim.View All Prempro Articles

Suffered harm from Prempro? You may have a lawsuit. Click here, for a top rated law firm to evaluate your legal rights.
If you have a good case your Prempro attorney can guide you through the beginning phases of the litigation, deciding which parties to name as defendants and where to file the lawsuit. After that an experienced Prempro lawyer will be able to handle the special requirements of pharmaceutical litigation and stand up to the high-powered attorneys who represent large pharmaceutical companies. This is not the kind of litigation you should consider handing on your own, since it’s very specialized and your chances of succeeding on your own are very slight. Even if your case is settled before trial, you will almost always get a larger settlement if you are represented by an experienced attorney.
Of course, it isn’t always easy finding an attorney which this kind of specialization. you could try getting recommendations from people you know. If you can’t get a recommendation for a pharmaceutical-litigation specialist, a good place to start looking for one is AttorneyPages.com, where you’ll find listings for drug liability specialists in your area, or post your case to the free Case Evaluation Form. After posting your case, an experienced law firm that handles Prempro and similar cases will contact you for a free case evaluation, without any obligation.
Check out the following articles for more information about Prempro, filing a Prempro lawsuit and finding a Prempro attorney:
For more information about Prempro, see Drug Overview: Prempro Side Effects and Claims
For more information about Prempro side effects, see Prempro Side Effects, Breast Cancer, Heart Attacks & Strokes
To find out more about the FDA warning, see Prempro Side Effects and Risks
For more information about Prempro updates, see Prempro Information and Warnings
If you would like to learn more about Prempro lawsuits, see Prempro Lawsuits, Litigation & Lawyers
Suffered harm from Prempro? You may have a lawsuit. Click here, for a top rated law firm to evaluate your legal rights.

Read more for related video clips.

Continue reading “Hiring a Prempro Attorney and Lawyer”

Prempro Lawsuits, Litigation and Lawyers – What You Should Know

Prempro Lawsuit Drug Toxic Chemicals

Free Case Evaluation From An Experienced Drug Liability Attorney.

Prempro Lawsuits, Litigation and Lawyers – What You Should Know

Prempro is the top-selling drug for hormone replacement therapy (HRT or HT). Prempro, manufactured by Wyeth, is supposed to help alleviate some of the effects of menopause in postmenopausal women, such as to prevent osteoporosis or loss of bone density. Prempro was the drug used in the 2002 National Institute of Health study. That study concluded the risks of life-threatening Pempro side effects outweighed any benefits.
View All Prempro Articles

Suffered harm from Prempro? You may have a lawsuit. Click here, for a top rated law firm to evaluate your legal rights.

After the 2002 study was published in the July 2002 issue of JAMA, the American Medical Association’s journal, hundreds of lawsuits were filed to recover damages for injuries suffered by women who had taken Prempro.

For example, three women in Boston filed Prempro litigation. Two of them have developed blood clots after several years on HRT therapy with Prempro and the third has developed breast cancer. The Prempro attorney for these three women argues that Prempro was unreasonably dangerous for long-term use and that the defendants, including Wyeth, promoted the drug therapy without doing necessary long-term clinical trials to find out if the therapy was safe enough to go on the market.

Prempro lawsuits claim that Wyeth did not do adequate safety testing, and promoted the drug without knowing if it was safe. Wyeth is also accused of withholding information about dangerous side effects from the public, placing the users of Prempro at deadly risk.

At least two Prempro class action lawsuits have been filed, but neither Prempro class action has been successful in getting class action certification. Certification was denied in an Arkansas federal court in 2005 and a suit in Florida state court was denied certification by an appeals court in February 2006. These ruling have no effect on individual Prempro lawsuits. They only mean that individuals who have been damaged have to bring their own lawsuits.

Check out the following articles for more information about Prempro, filing a Prempro lawsuit and finding a Prempro attorney:

For more information about Prempro, see Drug Overview: Prempro Side Effects and Claims
For more information about Prempro side effects, see Prempro Side Effects, Breast Cancer, Heart Attacks & Strokes
To find out more about the FDA warning, see Prempro Side Effects and Risks
For more information about Prempro updates, see Prempro Information and Warnings
To learn more about Prempro attorneys and how to find one, see Hiring a Prempro Attorney and Lawyer

Suffered harm from Prempro? You may have a lawsuit. Click here, for a top rated law firm to evaluate your legal rights.

Read more for related video clips.

Continue reading “Prempro Lawsuits, Litigation and Lawyers – What You Should Know”

Are there any special considerations in a case involving Paxil?

Paxil Lawsuit Special Considerations Drug Toxic Chemicals

Free Case Evaluation From An Experienced Drug Liability Attorney.

Are there any special considerations in a case involving Paxil?

Paxil was approved by the FDA for treating depression, obsessive-compulsive disorder, panic disorder, and social anxiety disorder in 1992. The FDA later approved the use of Paxil for treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder, in 2001. At that time, however, the FDA also required that Paxil’s manufacturer increase the level of warnings to deal with the fact that the manufacturer had never adequately warned of the serious side effects many people suffered when attempting to withdraw from Paxil. In fact, Paxil had, at that point, been marketed for years as being non-habit forming when, in fact, many patients continued to use it simply to avoid the severe withdrawal symptoms.

If you or your loved one suffered serious side effects from withdrawal or were unable to discontinue using Paxil, you may have a case against the manufacturer for not emphasizing this information. Depending on when you started taking Paxil, you may also have a case against your doctor if, in fact, the warnings had been changed before you started taking Paxil and your doctor never adequately warned you about the problems with withdrawing from Paxil.

If your child suffered from birth defects or persistent pulmonary hypertension (PPHN) after the mother took Paxil during pregnancy, you may have a cause of action against the manufacturer for failing to adequately warn you or against the treating doctor for not warning about the dangers of using Paxil during pregnancy.

Another issue arises in that the FDA never approved Paxil for use in treating depression and other mental disorders in children. Nonetheless, Paxil’s manufacturer promoted the use of Paxil for children for many years. Paxil does not appear to adequately treat children suffering from depression. In addition, the use of Paxil has been linked to increased suicidal tendencies in children and adolescents. If your child used Paxil and attempted or committed suicide, you probably have a cause of action for damages against the manufacturer. You may also have a cause of action against your child’s doctor. Although Paxil was promoted as helping children, the FDA did not approve it for that use and your child’s doctor should have been aware of that.

Finally, Paxil has been linked with increased suicidal and homicidal tendencies in adults. Again, this appears to be a tendency that the manufacturer was aware of but chose to downplay or ignore. If your loved one committed or attempted suicide while taking Paxil, you may have a claim against the manufacturer.

Read more for related video clips.

Continue reading “Are there any special considerations in a case involving Paxil?”

It seems like common knowledge that Paxil causes increased suicidal tendencies and that some people can’t stop taking it due to the side effects of withdrawal. Why should I go to an attorney when it seems that I should be able to negotiate a settlement with the company on my own? Or would there be a benefit to joining a class action in my case?

Paxil Attorneys Versus Class Action Drug Toxic Chemicals

Free Case Evaluation From An Experienced Drug Liability Attorney.

It seems like common knowledge that Paxil causes increased suicidal tendencies and that some people can’t stop taking it due to the side effects of withdrawal. Why should I go to an attorney when it seems that I should be able to negotiate a settlement with the company on my own? Or would there be a benefit to joining a class action in my case?

It seems, at first glance, that you can save some money by negotiating with GlaxoSmithKline if you or a loved one has suffered from increased suicidal tendencies. However, you place your case at great risk by doing this. Large pharmaceutical companies, such as GlaxoSmithKline, have large legal departments with highly trained, experienced attorneys to defend them. The companies that insure GlaxoSmithKline also have experienced legal staffs and insurance adjusters, and in some cases, outside counsel may be brought in to help with a particular case.

If you choose to represent yourself, even if you think the case will only be negotiated and not go to trial, you will be up against some of the toughest and most experienced attorneys and insurance adjustors in the industry. You need to remember that their sole interest is in minimizing or completely denying any liability on the part of their client, even if that means that you do not receive the compensation to which you are entitled. Everything that you do or say will be scrutinized to see if it can be used to limit the company’s liability. And if your case does end up in court, you will be held to the same standards and the same deadlines as an experienced attorney.

Attorneys who handle personal injury cases usually take the case on a “contingency” fee basis. This means that part of your settlement or recovery, typically 1/3, will go to the law firm as compensation for their work. It also means that if they are unable to recover any money for you, you will not owe them anything for their legal services. This way, you can get good legal representation without having to pay a large retainer fee that you probably can’t afford. And while the percentage that the law firm retains may seem like a great deal, when you consider the amount of time, effort, and resources that go into the preparation of your case as well as the risk that the firm will not be compensated for any of it, you will see why these contingency arrangements are fair to both sides.

Your attorney will also be able to advise you whether it would make more sense to handle your case alone or as part of a class action. Some cases have unusual fact situations or will be making new law in the place where they are brought, and need to be handled as individual cases. However, many cases have a lot of things in common, and can be dealt with as part of a larger class action case. While it is true that most cases handled individually end up settling for more money, that is usually because there is something unusual about the case that makes it worth more money. Deciding whether to pursue a case individually or as part of a class action is an important decision. In many cases, once you make that decision, you will be unable to change it later. Your attorney can help you decide how best to handle your case.

Read more for related video clips.

Continue reading “It seems like common knowledge that Paxil causes increased suicidal tendencies and that some people can’t stop taking it due to the side effects of withdrawal. Why should I go to an attorney when it seems that I should be able to negotiate a settlement with the company on my own? Or would there be a benefit to joining a class action in my case?”

What is the statute of limitations in a case alleging suicidal tendencies or severe withdrawal symptoms caused by Paxil?

Paxil Statute Of Limitations Drug Toxic Chemicals

Free Case Evaluation From An Experienced Drug Liability Attorney.

What is the statute of limitations in a case alleging suicidal tendencies or severe withdrawal symptoms caused by Paxil?

Lawsuits involving Paxil may be brought by surviving relatives as wrongful death suits or may be brought by the person affected as a personal injury lawsuit, depending on the outcome of the suicide attempt. The statute of limitations in personal injury and wrongful death cases often vary from place to place. However, a general rule of thumb is that you have around 2 years from the date that the injury is suffered or the person dies.

Many things can affect this basic statement, however. Different states may have a different length of time based on the type of injury involved or may look at different triggering events as the point for starting the clock on the statute of limitations. There is no easy way to know whether your case will run into problems with the statute of limitations in your state. Therefore, even if you are concerned that the statute of limitations has run, you should consult with an experienced attorney as quickly as possible to see if you do, indeed, have time to file an action or get some other type of relief through a class action settlement. Your attorney will be able to tell you if the statute of limitations has run and, if it has, if there is any recourse available to you.

Read more for related video clips.

Continue reading “What is the statute of limitations in a case alleging suicidal tendencies or severe withdrawal symptoms caused by Paxil?”

Was Paxil approved by FDA? Why was it prescribed? What are the adverse side effects of taking Paxil?

Paxil Side Effects And Uses Drug Toxic Chemicals

Free Case Evaluation From An Experienced Drug Liability Attorney.

Was Paxil approved by FDA? Why was it prescribed? What are the adverse side effects of taking Paxil?

Paxil is an anti-depressant drug, approved by the FDA for use in adults suffering from depression, obsessive compulsive disorder, panic disorder, and social anxiety disorder. The FDA later approved Paxil for use in treating post-traumatic stress syndrome. The FDA never approved the use of Paxil for children; however, Glaxo-Smith-Kline, the manufacturer of Paxil, promoted the use of Paxil for children to doctors who believed that it was safe and effective.

Patients who have had Paxil prescribed for them have exhibited significantly increased suicidal and homicidal tendencies, resulting in suicide attempts, suicides, and homicides. In August of 2001, a jury awarded the relatives of a Wyoming man $8 million dollars in a wrongful death suit after the man, who had taken Paxil as prescribed by his Paxil is an antidepressant drug, approved by the FDA for use in adults suffering from depression, obsessive-compulsive disorder, panic disorder, and social anxiety disorder. The FDA later approved Paxil for use in treating posttraumatic stress syndrome. The FDA never approved the use of Paxil for children; however, GlaxoSmithKline, the manufacturer of Paxil, promoted the use of Paxil for children to doctors as safe and effective.

Babies of mothers who have taken Paxil during pregnancy have suffered from an array of side effects linked to SSRI (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor) antidepressants. Heart defects that involve holes in heart walls have been particularly linked to Paxil.

Patients who have had Paxil prescribed for them have also exhibited significantly increased suicidal and homicidal tendencies, resulting in suicide attempts, suicides, and homicides. In August of 2001, a jury awarded the relatives of a Wyoming man $8 million dollars in a wrongful death suit after the man, who had taken Paxil as prescribed by his doctor, killed his wife, daughter, and granddaughter before killing himself. One of the claims made in the case was that the manufacturer had known since 1990 that Paxil could cause homicidal and suicidal tendencies in certain people, but had failed to adequately notify doctors and patients about these tendencies.

Additionally, in 2004 the Attorney General of New York negotiated a settlement over claims that the manufacturer had committed fraud by promoting the use of Paxil in children. The manufacturer was accused of concealing information from four different studies which concluded that Paxil was not only ineffective in treating depression in children, but that it greatly increased suicidal tendencies in children who took it.

Finally, although Paxil’s manufacturer marketed the drug for years as “non-habit forming”, many users found that they were unable to discontinue use of the drug, even under a doctor’s care, due to severe side effects including the feeling of electrical “zaps”, dizziness and vertigo, extreme nausea and vomiting, anorexia, aggression, irritability, sleep disturbances, sweating, and memory and concentration difficulties. Paxil became a drug that some patients were required to continue taking to keep these symptoms at bay. Nonetheless, it was 9 years after Paxil was first approved by the FDA before the FDA required stricter warnings about the side effects of withdrawal.

These increased suicidal and homicidal tendencies, in children and adults, as well as some patients’ inability to discontinue taking Paxil due to severe side effects have formed the basis for a number of cases against GlaxoSmithKline around the country.

Read more for related video clips.

Continue reading “Was Paxil approved by FDA? Why was it prescribed? What are the adverse side effects of taking Paxil?”