A structured settlement is a financial or insurance arrangement, including periodic payments, that a claimant accepts to resolve a personal injury tort claim or to compromise a statutory periodic payment obligation. Structured settlements were first utilized in Canada and the United States during the 1970s as an alternative to lump sum settlements. Structured settlements are now part of the statutory tort law of several common law countries including Australia, Canada, England and the United States. Although some uniformity exists, each of these countries has its own definitions, rules and standards for structured settlements. Video clips explanations and cases below. Click to play.
donut, operator, case law, law class, laws, criminal justice, criminal justice class, criminal justice lecture, cops, police, case laws, penn v mimms, Pennsylvania v Mimms, Maryland v Wilson, Brendlin V California, Tennessee v Garner, Chimel v California, terry v ohio, Minnesota v Dickerson, Illinois v Wardlow, Graham v Connor, Maryland v King, Mapp v Ohio, Whren V US, Hiibel V Nevada
new york, law, legal, Court, mark pollard, pollard justice, Criminal Defense Attorney, Attorney, Criminal Attorney, New York City, legal advice, criminal lawyer, criminal defense lawyer, best, criminal lawyer in New York, how to become a lawyer, criminal defense, know your rights, legalize it, new york city cops, legal advice on domestic violence, legal advice for divorce or separation, legal advice for child support
In this video Criminal Defense Attorney Mark Pollard, based in New York City, s...
The National Defense Authorization Act — the bill in which Congress tells the ...
Structured settlements may include income tax and spendthrift requirements as well as benefits. Structured settlement payments are sometimes called “periodic payments.” A structured settlement incorporated into a trial judgment is called a “periodic payment judgment.