Can I sue for defamatory statements made by a witness under oath in court?

Judicial Proceeding Libel And Slander

Can I sue for defamatory statements made by a witness under oath in court?

Statements in a judicial proceeding are privileged. A judge, juror, lawyers, witnesses, or other parties are absolutely protected from defamation actions. For example, you are involved in an employment dispute with your former employer. The employer testifies that you are a drunk and a thief, while knowing the statements are untrue. Though untrue, your former employer can make the defamatory statements on the stand without being sued by you afterwards. Witnesses who lie are instead subject to perjury charges, a criminal offense that is brought by a district attorney, not a civil claim subject to monetary damages.

Some aspects of the political process are also protected from defamation suits. Federal or state legislators cannot be sued for libel or slander for their statements in committee hearings or during floor debates.

Read more for related video clips.

Continue reading “Can I sue for defamatory statements made by a witness under oath in court?”

Collection Agencies: Not Above the Law

collection-agencies collections

Collection Agencies: Not Above the Law

Stress. Worry. Confusion. All of these emotions are understandable if you’re stuck with large amounts of debt. Constant contact from demanding collection agencies can be worrisome and disruptive. But is your collection agency acting within the law? Here’s what you need to know about your rights with respect to collection agencies.
United States residents have certain rights and responsibilities when it comes to collection agencies thanks to federal and state laws that are designed to protect debtors from unfair debt collection practices. The federal Fair Debt Collection Act (FDCA) doesn’t change the amount of money you may owe, but it demands that creditors act according to certain strict standards of fairness.
Reasonable and Fair Contact
The standards set forth by the FDCA are straightforward and have to do with reasonable and fair contact. For example, creditors may not contact you outside of reasonable hours (reasonable hours are usually between 8 a.m. and 9 p.m.) or by unreasonable means. While mail, telephone, fax, or in-person contacts are all considered reasonable, these contacts cannot be at odd hours or in strange formats. In addition, you have the right to ask a collection agency to quit contacting you. Though this does not erase your debt, your wishes must be followed by the agency. Write a letter to your creditor asking not to be contacted again; aside from replying to acknowledge receipt, the creditor is barred by law from contacting you.
Beware: even if you request that creditor contact cease, your creditors may resume contact once they send you proof that you do indeed owe a debt. Any initial contact by a creditor must be followed by written proof of the debt within 5 days; this contact must include an up-to-date name and address for the creditor, the consequences of failure to pay, and the amount you owe.
Contacting You at Work
Federal agencies are not allowed to contact you at work if your employer does not approve of such contact. They are also strictly regulated as to what they may and may not say to you. Threats are no-nos, and creditors aren’t allowed to threaten to seize your property, arrest you, garnish your wages, or threaten you with nonexistent lawsuits unless legal action is actually pending. Falsehood and misleading behavior is also frowned upon — the amount owed must be properly represented and representatives are not allowed to pose as police officers or lawyers.
Crossing the Line
How do you know if a debt collector has crossed the line? If you feel abused, harassed, conned or that your privacy has been violated, a violation of federal law may have occurred. Debt collectors should never lie to you about their identity or pressure you through threats of legal or criminal action. If you feel that the debt collector has violated federal or state law, get in touch with an experienced consumer credit counselor as soon as possible to evaluate your options.

Continue reading “Collection Agencies: Not Above the Law”

Debt Collector Calling Your Cell? You May Be Entitled To $1,500 Per Call

debt-collectors-calling-cell-phone collections

Debt Collector Calling Your Cell? You May Be Entitled To $1,500 Per Call

Debt collectors who call you on your cell phone without your express written consent are violating the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). When that happens, you may be entitled to $1,500 per unauthorized call.
Attorney Steve Recordon
Since many debtors don’t know about the TCPA, we interviewed Steve Recordon, an attorney from San Diego, California whose firm represents individuals who have been sued or harassed by debt buyers, to tell us more. Here’s what he said:
Why should someone contact an attorney in these cases? There are two reasons. One is that their privacy has been invaded and the second is that they may be entitled to money damages. They didn’t give anybody their cell phone number and shouldn’t have someone calling them either asking for money or asking questions about their mom. It’s not right and it shouldn’t continue. A lawyer can stop that from happening.
There’s a $500 per phone call minimum damage element under the statute. That’s if it’s unintentional. If it’s intentional, the maximum damage element is $1,500 per phone call. In my opinion, I don’t see how it could ever really be unintentional. They’re either making the phone call or they’re not. And if they make the phone call, they intended to make the phone call; therefore it’s intentional, and, therefore, the $1,500 applies.
Violations add up. I had a client tell me that they’ve received a call every day for the past three months. So, 90 calls times $1,500 per offense equals $135,000. That’s the actual debtor they’re calling, but you can’t exclude the others such as family members or friends. Sometimes coworkers and neighbors are also getting called on their cell phones. These companies can be downright aggressive.
Most calls are intentional. So far, the only plausible argument I’ve heard about a call being unintentional was from one of the defense lawyers. He told me that his client bought the debt from Capital Once and that Capital One said they had permission to call the person on their cell phone. However, it just doesn’t hold water. I love creative reasoning and you get a lot of that from debt buyers’ lawyers. They’re just trying to avoid paying $1,500 per offense rather than $500 per offense. When you’re talking about a class action with 30,000 members, it adds up.
If you believe that a debt collector has contacted you in violation of the TCPA or you’ve been harassed by a debt buyer in violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), contact an experienced debtor’s right attorney to discuss your situation and evaluate your options. Consultations are free, without obligation and are strictly confidential.

Continue reading “Debt Collector Calling Your Cell? You May Be Entitled To $1,500 Per Call”

Birth Injury Attorney Interview – The A to Z of Birth Injury Lawsuits

Birth Injury Attorney Interview Injury Law

Birth Injury Attorney Interview – The A to Z of Birth Injury Lawsuits

This is a transcript from an interview on birth injury cases with Jeff Milman, an attorney who has been practicingmedical negligence law for 26 years and and member of the Advocate Law Group. Attorney Milman is a member of ABOTA, the American Board of Trial Advocates, an association where you have to have demonstrated proficiency in trying at least a minimum of 20 jury trials. He was president of the Orange County Trial Lawyers in 2004 and his practice is located in Newport Beach, California.
FreeAdvice:: Can you provide an overview of birth injury cases for us?
Jeff Milman: Birth injury cases are the most complex type of medical negligence cases around. Usually it involves a tragedy to a family; especially if the child is born profoundly injured, whether it is brain injury or dystocia (a shoulder problem), and the child survives. It also affects the parents. It requires multiple experts. It requires a good sum of money to retain experts and prosecute and it requires a very, very, very experienced lawyer to handle these types of cases.
FreeAdvice:: What are the different types of birth injury cases?
Jeff Milman: The two we see primarily for those children that survive are number one, brain injury – or anoxic brain injury, what they call hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. The claims in those cases are usually that the physician or the medical staff failed to properly monitor the birth process via the fetal monitoring strips and order a caesarean section in a timely fashion.
The second type of cases we see are where there is a vaginal delivery and the physician and the staff failed to properly help the baby down the canal such that the baby is born with dystocia which can affect palsy and a host of other things.
There are the death cases and we also see cases where there was improper genetic screening and of course, the baby is born with a genetic problem.
FreeAdvice:: Who can make a birth injury claim?
Jeff Milman: The birth injury claim would be made on behalf of the minor if the minor is alive. One of the parents or both of the parents would be the guardian ad litem, or for the purposes of litigation, the guardian. Also, in California, if the parents observed negligence occurring, and in fact appreciated at the time there was negligence going on, they could also make a claim for what they call negligent infliction of emotional distress. But there are some hurdles to those and they’re very difficult to prove in court.
FreeAdvice:: Are there limits on that?
Jeff Milman: Each state has different limits. In California, we have MICRA, the Medical Injury Compensation Reform Act, which has been around since 1975. It caps the amount of pain and suffering to $250,000 for the child. For negligent infliction claims for the parents, there would be separate caps to a maximum of $250,000 and unfortunately, if there is a death, it’s $250,000 for a family – total. Now, of course, if you go to other states, for example, Nevada; they have a $600,000 cap. Some other states have no caps.
FreeAdvice:: Would there be a cap if it was intentional infliction of emotional distress?
Jeff Milman: If you can prove that a physician or staff intended to hurt someone or there’s a battery that takes it outside of the negligence venue, then yes; you can avoid caps. However, that’s pretty difficult to do.
FreeAdvice:: What’s unique about a birth injury case versus just a typical medical malpractice case?
Jeff Milman: Birth injury cases are unique in that you have multiple, multiple experts. They are extremely complex and these cases are very expensive. For example, when we look at a case in which the baby suffered fetal bradycardia, where there was a deprivation of oxygen and a caesarean section wasn’t done fast enough, we’re looking at hiring a labor and delivery nurse. We look at hiring in obstetric gynecologist. We’re hiring an expert on neonatology. We then might have the baby examined by a pediatric neurologist, a physical medicine and a rehab specialist. We would get a lifecare planner involved to project out all the future medical needs along with these other physicians along with a forensic economist. So, it’s not unusual to have costs on these cases escalate to upwards of $100,000 or more if you’re going to go to trial.
FreeAdvice:: Who is generally responsible for paying for the upfront costs in these types of cases?
Jeff Milman: Sometimes we’ll ask the client to pay the initial expert review, maybe $1000 or less. But by and by, the law firm expends the costs for the majority of these on a contingency basis. If we recover a settlement or verdict, we would be reimbursed our costs.
FreeAdvice:: What are the differences between a birth injury case and a wrongful death case involving a newborn?
Jeff Milman: These are labels. A birth injury implies that something happened during the birthing process that can result in either a damaged child who has neurological or profound disabilities or a child that is born viable and then dies. So once there’s a death, the label is a wrongful death case. If the child survives, the label is called a birth injury negligence case.
FreeAdvice:: How do damages differ in these types of cases?
Jeff Milman: Unfortunately, damages are capped at $250,000 per family in a wrongful death case. When you have a child that’s born profoundly damaged, you’re dealing with different damages. You’re dealing with a $250,000 pain and suffering damage cap for that child and then you’re dealing with some fairly sizeable numbers for future medical care and also lost earnings if the child will be unemployable by virtue of its disabilities. Then there’s the issue of attendant nursing care. For example, if you have a mother or a father who are spending a great deal of their daily time providing direct nursing care that they otherwise would not have to do for a child without disabilities, they would be entitled to be reimbursed for that.
FreeAdvice:: What is the statute of limitations for filing a birth injury claim?
Jeff Milman: For the adult in California, it’s one year from the date you knew, or with suspicion should have known, of injury or damage. So for example, if the parent has a negligent infliction of emotional distress claim, they should be talking to a lawyer pronto. For the baby, they have upwards of eight years. The statutes are somewhat complex, so I would advise anyone who even suspects there is a birth injury to immediately acquire the records and see a competent attorney rather than risk the statute of limitations barring their claim.
FreeAdvice:: What type of medical records do you need to obtain when filing a lawsuit?
Jeff Milman: Eventually, the lawyers are going to get all the records, but the clients should initially request the prenatal chart – the chart that the doctor keeps in their office for the mother. It would be under the mother’s name. Then separately, assuming the baby is born in a hospital; there will be two charts to obtain. One will be a chart under the mother’s name and the other will be a chart under the baby’s name which would include the pediatric records and the neonatology records. The last thing to make sure clients get their hands on is the fetal monitoring strips. Later on, the lawyers can get other things such as the MRI films, but the important thing to know is that hospital records have two separate charts; one for mom, one for baby.
FreeAdvice:: Do you ever see cases where the parents are bringing a suit against a midwife?
Jeff Milman: I have had a few of those cases. By and by, midwives are not the flavor of the month, as it were. So they’re not as prevalent as they once were. But yes, if a midwife is negligent, they, as a medical provider, have the same exposure as any other medical provider such as a nurse, a nurse practitioner or a doctor.
FreeAdvice:: Who should obtain these medical records?
Jeff Milman: It would be prudent for both the parent and the lawyer to obtain them, actually. If you suspect that there’s medical negligence, parents should immediately try and get a copy of the records. Then later on, as the litigation progresses, we (the lawyers) obtain the records via subpoena and authorization. Every once in a while you get lucky and it turns out the records that the parents obtained are not the same ones supplied in the litigation and they’ve been altered. It doesn’t happen often, but nothing settles a case faster than altered records.
FreeAdvice:: Is it difficult for non-lawyers to obtain these documents from hospitals, especially when the hospitals suspect that a lawsuit may be filed?
Jeff Milman: It depends on the hospital. Some hospitals are very giving and others will put roadblocks up in their way. The important thing to remember is that absent copying charges, these records are that of the patients and they have the right to them. So don’t take no for an answer.
FreeAdvice:: What would you advise people to do if they can’t get anywhere with the hospital on obtaining the medical records?
Jeff Milman: Go see your lawyer.
FreeAdvice:: What type of evidence is typically involved in a birth injury case?
Jeff Milman: Depending on the case, we will have fetal monitoring strips. We may use blow ups of certain injuries that are created by medical illustrators. There will be a number of reports which the experts prepare, especially the economics. Then, we routinely put together two videos; one is called “A Day in the Life” which is intended to be shown in court and it will supplement the testimony of the parents as to what they have to do on a daily basis.
We’ll also do a shortened version, maybe a 10 or 15 minute version of what we call a “settlement” or “mediation” brochure and we’ll use that as evidence to get across how much effort there is and how profoundly it affects the family.
FreeAdvice:: What type of experts do you use and when do you consult with them?
Jeff Milman: I consult with them right off the bat. The first experts I’m going to consult with are labor and delivery nurses to assist me in evaluating the fetal monitoring strips, if that’s the issue. I will also get an obstetrics gynecology expert who is a specialist in the type of case we’re looking at.
Once I have a thumb’s up from them on the issues of liability, that there was in fact negligence, I want to rule out other causes that could cause birth injuries besides the negligence. So, I will get a neonatologist to review the chart and make sure that there’s not something genetic or something that occurred after the birth, for example, in the neonatology ward.
Once I have those experts solidly in place, then we’re going to get the damages experts involved and get the baby evaluated and seen by a life care planner, a pediatric neurologist, a physical medicine and rehab expert, have economic reports put together and the day in the life information done.
FreeAdvice:: It sounds as though the process of whether to file a lawsuit is very complex. Do you often see other attorneys whose practices don’t focus in this area taking on these cases and not doing everything that they should?
Jeff Milman: Unfortunately, yes. This is not an area of law one should dabble in. This is not an area for someone who’s a general practitioner. This is a high specialty area and I’ve seen a myriad of times where the attorney handling the case gets in way too deep, runs out of money, has hired the wrong experts or doesn’t have experts at all. So definitely, if you are a consumer and you’re contemplating bringing one of these cases, make sure you find an attorney that is up to the challenge of handling this and ask them point blank, what percentage of their practice is medical negligence? Have they handled birth injury cases? What has been their track record?
FreeAdvice:: What are the differences in prosecuting doctors versus nurses versus an HMO?
Jeff Milman: There really aren’t any differences. The HMO issues deal with the fact that you may be bound by an arbitration agreement such as Kaiser Permanente or if it’s a Veteran’s Administration case, you may be bound in federal court. However, whether you pursue a doctor, a nurse or an HMO, the issues are pretty much the same. Did a professional breach the acceptable standard of care? In other words, was somebody negligent? Did they mess up and was that a cause of injury?
So, we have to prove three things; liability, causation and damages – and we do that through the experts.
FreeAdvice:: Does dealing with the Kaiser Permanente arbitration process tend to limit damages in your opinion or is it basically the same as going to court, just in a different venue?
Jeff Milman: Well, the law is the same. I’m not a fan of arbitration, although I will say that I have won certain cases in arbitration that a jury may not have given money on. By and by, you tend to have a retired judge as an arbitrator and they tend to be a little more conservative than a jury. However, the damages are the same.
FreeAdvice:: How much money does it take to prosecute a birth injury case?
Jeff Milman: I would say, realistically, to get the case into settlement mode, at least $40,000 or $50,000. If you’re going to go to trial and spend two or three weeks in trial, it could go upwards as high as $150,000 in costs. Those costs are generated by the sheer volume of discovery, depositions and experts that are used.
FreeAdvice:: How long does it take to prosecute one of these cases?
Jeff Milman: It depends on what court and state you’re in. When I first started practice in California, it would take upwards of five years to get a case to trial.
Now, for example, in California’s Orange County, they’re generally done within 18 months. In Riverside County in California, they have a moratorium. They can’t get civil cases out to trial so you’re kind of victim to whatever the court system is.
FreeAdvice:: How long does it generally take to get to arbitration in the Kaiser Permanente process?
Jeff Milman: Kaiser now has fixed rules. Before they were somewhat guilty of taking too long and our Supreme Court in California was very critical of them. They’ve now put together what they call the OIA, or Office of Independent Administrator, and the goal is to get these cases to trial within 12 to 18 months and they are succeeding in that regard.
FreeAdvice:: How many cases go to trial versus settling?
Jeff Milman: In medical negligence, we tend to try more cases than you would in, for example, car accident cases or business cases. I would say probably about 90% of our cases settle and the key to that is good case selection. We have to have good experts and we’ve got to have a good case going in or else it’s going to be a disaster.
FreeAdvice:: Is there anything that someone bringing a birth injury lawsuit should or shouldn’t do?
Jeff Milman: They should immediately get the records. They shouldn’t write things or say things that could be used against them later on. For example, writing nasty letters to the hospital administrators. They need to be cool, calm and collected. They need to collect whatever evidence they can and then they need to apply for whatever healthcare and government insurance that might be available above and beyond their regular healthcare.
FreeAdvice:: What is a lifecare plan?
Jeff Milman: It is a plan usually created by a nurse that is certified as a lifecare planner. He or she interacts with the treating physicians of the child, the pediatrician, as well as experts that we retain for purposes of the case such as the pediatric neurologist, a pediatric physical medicine expert and a rehabilitation expert. The goal is to set forth all of the future medical care needs down to Band-Aids and medicines that this child may need over the course of his or her lifetime.
FreeAdvice:: Is a life care plan based upon what it would cost in today’s dollar or is there an inflation factor that is figured in?
Jeff Milman: The lifecare plan is for the baby’s lifetime. We get an economist who will basically evaluate that lifecare plan and put the figures in today’s dollars.
So for example, you may have a lifecare plan that deals with $12 million of needs of this child through age 75. However, the present value, meaning the amount that it would cost to write a check to let the money grow and cover all that may be say, $3 million. Of course, the other side will have competing experts that will say that our numbers are inflated, so we get to fight about that.
FreeAdvice:: Does the family or the child have an opportunity to come back if there’s a later complication that will require more money than what the life care plan called for?
Jeff Milman: Basically, once you settle, you settle. Under rare circumstances, if the child dies later on from the injuries, the family might be able to bring a wrongful death case if the death is related to the negligence. However, most defendants don’t want to include that and they want to write one check and be done with it. So I always joke with my clients and say, if you sign the settlement agreement and you get your money, if your neck and back turn green and fall off tomorrow, it’s your problem, not theirs.
There are different ways to settle cases. There are special needs trusts and there’s payment streams called annuities. Some annuities are guaranteed, meaning that if the child were to die, the heirs get the funds. Others are only for the life of the child.
If you go to trial and have a verdict, the court can set limits, monitor and cut off payments that are ordered by the jury for future medical needs if there’s a change. So for example, if the jury has allocated $3 million for future medical needs and the child dies two years later, the defendants can go to court on certain occasions and cut that stream off. However, that’s with a verdict; settlements are different and you can control how the money is allocated.
FreeAdvice:: What is vicarious liability and how does it affect birth injury cases?
Jeff Milman: Vicarious liability is a legal term that says that someone is responsible for the acts of another. For example, if I’m an employer and my employee’s running an errand for me and gets in a car accident, I’m vicariously responsible for the employee even though I did nothing wrong.
In birth injury cases, you’ll mostly find that the doctors at private hospitals are independent contractors but the nurses are employees of the hospital. So, the hospital would be vicariously liable for the acts of the nurse.
If it’s Kaiser, for example, then both the doctors and nurses are employees of Kaiser and Kaiser would be responsible for their employees’ acts. If it’s federal, then the United States government is responsible for the conduct of the doctors and nurses at a Veteran’s Hospital.
FreeAdvice:: What is a special needs trust?
Jeff Milman: What happens in a lot of cases, unless you’re particularly well-funded through private insurance, parents will apply for government benefits such as Medi-Cal and sometimes Medicare. There can be regional centers that take care and provide education for the children.
One of the goals when you settle a case is to bring in an attorney who specializes in special needs trusts and as part of any settlement, to the best of our ability, shield the money that the child and parents get so that their ability to obtain government benefits is not cut off. That is a special needs trust.
These settlements are overseen by a judge; we call it a minor’s compromise. The judge has to make sure that the money is handled properly, that nobody’s absconding with it and that the amount of the settlement is fair. So, there’s a second set of eyes watching what’s going on.
FreeAdvice:: What type of attorney should somebody hire in a birth injury case?
Jeff Milman: They should hire a lawyer who specializes in medical negligence and has the skill, knowledge and financial resources to do birth injury cases. Clients should ask some serious questions such as how many of these have you handled and what’s your track record?
FreeAdvice:: How are attorneys compensated in birth injury cases?
Jeff Milman: Depending on the state, attorneys are usually compensated on a contingency fee basis. For example, in California, MICRA limits recovery to 25% for minors after expenses have been reimbursed.
FreeAdvice:: Does that percentage change if you appeal a case?
Jeff Milman: It depends on the state. For example, some attorneys will write a contract that provides for a contingency fee of 25%, but will increase that to 33% if you go to trial. However, in medical negligence cases, the fees are strictly controlled by MICRA; so generally, it’s not going to change.
FreeAdvice:: Is there anything else you’d like to add about birth injury cases?
Jeff Milman: Parents don’t sign off to have a profoundly damaged child. It is a horrendous thing and even though you love your child, you are faced with one of the most serious types of injuries there are. It’s very emotional for the parents, for the child, for the brothers and sisters, for grandparents that may be around, and for family and friends. So if you feel there’s medical negligence, get the records and talk to a competent attorney who can assist you.
If your child was profoundly injured or died as the result of medical negligence, contact an attorney whose practice focuses in this area of law for help. To contact an experienced attorney near you, please click here.

Read more for related video clips.

Continue reading “Birth Injury Attorney Interview – The A to Z of Birth Injury Lawsuits”

Are there any money damages that are unique to birth injuries?

Birth Injury Money Damages Injury Law

Are there any money damages that are unique to birth injuries?

Money damages in a birth injury case-compared to other personal injury cases-are unique in the high dollar amounts and the expertise required in determining what the actual damages are. Lawyers usually have to hire a variety of experts, including economists and rehabilitation specialists, to come up with an amount. Additionally, in many states, parents are in a position to collect damages for either the value of their services in taking care of a disabled child, or what it will cost to have someone else do so. For example, if you have three other children and can’t adequately take care of them because the disabled child requires around the clock attention, you can recover what it will cost to hire a nanny or what it will cost you in lost income to take care of the child. Parents may also be able to recover damages for emotional suffering.

Seek the advice of an experienced personal injury attorney right away if you and/or your baby has suffered from birth injuries. You can have your case assessed for free by completing the Free Advice case evaluation form.

Read more for related video clips.

Continue reading “Are there any money damages that are unique to birth injuries?”

Welding Rods Information and Warnings

Welding Rod Information Drug Toxic Chemicals

Free Case Evaluation From An Experienced Drug Liability Attorney.

Welding Rods Information and Warnings

Welding rods and other pieces of metal used in the welding process release toxic fumes and dust when heated. The most serious welding rods side effects have been found from the absorption of manganese, a chemical element that occurs naturally in the environment and is an essential nutrient in small amounts. In the larger amounts released during welding, manganese can cause long-term health problems.

Suffered harm from Welding Rod exposure? You may have a lawsuit. Click here, for a top rated law firm to evaluate your legal rights.

Manganese poisoning has been linked to a disease called Manganism that is either similar
to or the same as Parkinson’s disease. Parkinson’s occurs when the brain cells that produce dopamine die and there isn’t enough dopamine for the nervous system to send messages needed for the body to move easily. The disease is progressive, which means it gets worse over time, often progressing from tremors to paralysis. Manganism may be reversible in the early stages, so recognition of symptoms is very important. See Welding Rods Side Effects – Parkinson’s & Cancer for help in identifying the early stages of Manganism.

Welding rods information has been available for decades. The first published report about the link between manganese exposure and Parkinson’s-like symptoms appeared in 1837. Other reports were published in the 1930s, including a welding safety pamphlet published by an insurance company that warned about the dangers of toxic fumes. The welding process was linked to Parkinson’s symptoms again by a toxicologist in 1963, and in 1981 the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended the use of safety equipment to reduce exposure to manganese. In spite of these welding rod warnings, many workers haven’t been adequately protected from toxic fumes and dust in the workplace.

If you use welding materials, you should be very careful to read all warnings and to make sure that toxic fumes and dusts cannot enter through the respiratory system, skin, or eyes. Use a good respirator, wear protective clothing over all exposed skin, and use eye protection. Be careful not to touch dust left on protective clothing or protective equipment with your bare skin. If you have been exposed to toxic welding fumes, see your healthcare provider to be checked for early signs of Manganism. If you have suffered injury from manganese poisoning or other toxic effects of welding rods, you might be able to get damages for your injuries. See Welding Rods Attorney and Lawyer – How to Hire to find out how to have your case evaluated by a competent welding rods attorney.

Check out the following articles for more information about Welding rods, filing a Welding rods lawsuit and finding a Welding rods attorney.

For more information about welding rods, see Drug Overview: Welding Rods Side Effects and Claims

For more information about welding rods side effects, see Welding Rods Side Effects – Parkinson’s & Cancer

To find out more about warnings, see Welding Rods Side Effects and Risks

If you would like to learn more about welding rods lawsuits, see Welding Rods Lawsuits, Litigation & Lawyers

To learn more about welding rods attorneys and how to find one, see Hiring a Welding Rods Attorney and Lawyer

Suffered harm from Welding Rod exposure? You may have a lawsuit. Click here, for a top rated law firm to evaluate your legal rights.

Read more for related video clips.

Continue reading “Welding Rods Information and Warnings”

Drug Warnings: Welding Rods Side Effects and Risks

Welding Rod Warning Drug Toxic Chemicals

Free Case Evaluation From An Experienced Drug Liability Attorney.

Drug Warnings: Welding Rods Side Effects and Risks

Welding rods, used to fuse metal together in the welding process, have been found to release toxic levels of several chemical elements into the air when heated. These chemicals, in the form of fumes and dust, can have serious side effects. The largest number of welding rods side effects are from toxic levels of the chemical element manganese, but adverse side effects have resulted from exposure to chromium and nickel as well.

Suffered harm from Welding Rod exposure? You may have a lawsuit. Click here, for a top rated law firm to evaluate your legal rights.

Toxic exposure to fumes and dust from welding rods happens most often in the workplace where safe levels are determined by OSHA (Occupational Safety & Health Administration). For OSHA limits on manganese levels and the dangers of manganese
Exposure, see the publication of the National Safety Council. The FDA (Food and Drug Administration) controls the levels of manganese found in bottled water, but is not involved in occupational safety.

The first record of a link between manganese exposure and the symptoms of Parkinson’s disease was published in 1837, and the link was fairly well-known by the 1950s. In spite of this, manufacturers of welding rods and other welding materials did not begin including a welding rods warning on the product labels until around 1967. Even then the warning did not convey the real seriousness of the welding rods risk. A sample warning states:

CAUTION: Welding may produce fumes and gases hazardous to health. Avoid breathing these fumes and gases. Use adequate ventilation. Use USA standard Z49.1. “Safety in Welding and Cutting” Published by the American Welding Society

These warnings have often been placed on the bottom of packages where they weren’t likely to be seen. See Welding Rods Lawsuits, Litigation, and Lawyers – What You Should Know for legal decisions concerning welding rod warnings.

Manufacturers are required by law to produce material safety data sheets (MSDS) for products used in the workplace, and workers have a legal right to see them for any materials the workers are using. Click here for a sample welding rod MSDS.

Check out the following articles for more information about Welding rods, filing a Welding rods lawsuit and finding a Welding rods attorney.

For more information about welding rods, see Drug Overview: Welding Rods Side Effects and Claims

For more information about welding rods side effects, see Welding Rods Side Effects – Parkinson’s & Cancer

For more information about welding rod updates, see Welding Rods Information and Warnings

If you would like to learn more about welding rods lawsuits, see Welding Rods Lawsuits, Litigation & Lawyers

To learn more about welding rods attorneys and how to find one, see Hiring a Welding Rods Attorney and Lawyer

Suffered harm from Welding Rod exposure? You may have a lawsuit. Click here, for a top rated law firm to evaluate your legal rights.

Read more for related video clips.

Continue reading “Drug Warnings: Welding Rods Side Effects and Risks”

When Do You Have A Case Against A Debt Buyer?

when-you-have-lawsuit-against-debt-buyer collections

When Do You Have A Case Against A Debt Buyer?

Debt buyers, those companies who purchase bad debt for pennies on the dollar and then do anything – legal or not – to collect that debt from you, may be violating the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA). When this happens, you may have a case against them. But, how can you know for sure?
When does a debtor have a case against a debt buyer?
Steve Recordon, an attorney from San Diego, California whose firm represents individuals who have been sued or harassed by debt buyers, says that in almost all debt buyer situations, the debtor has a case. He explained, “The reason they have a case is that debt buyers usually can’t prove their cases. They don’t have the evidence that they need. For example, when they buy an account, they don’t get the original statements, they don’t get the original contract and these are all things that they need to prove up in court. Now sometimes they can go back to the original creditor, pay a fee and get some of those documents. However, they don’t want to have to do that. They don’t want to have to pay more money and they don’t want to pay for the expenses of having lawyers represent them. Those are more time consuming and expensive methods of collecting versus the straight default.”
When you don’t have a case…
Recordon says that you won’t have a case when you are going against an original creditor, such as Capital One, as it will have all of the original documentation, as well as the original contract. However, in the debt buyer situation, many debtors simply don’t realize is who is suing them. Recordon says that most debtors are honest, law-abiding people and may feel that they did have a credit card they didn’t pay off 10 years ago and want to do the right thing. Yet, he provided the following caution:
[Debtors] need to look at who’s suing them because the plaintiff in the action, the one that’s actually doing the suing is not the original creditor; it’s somebody else. Now the question is – do you owe money to the person who’s actually suing you? Have you ever heard of the person or company that’s actually suing you? Are they suing you for the right amount? Have they added in interest and attorneys’ fees that they’re not entitled to? Those are all the considerations that they need to look at even if they think they owe the money. You’ve got to analyze it a little further; go a little deeper into it.
If you’re being harassed by a debt collection company, contact an attorney to discuss your situation and evaluate your options. Consultations are free, without obligation and are strictly confidential. Click here to speak with an experienced debtor’s right collection lawyer who understands the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA).

Continue reading “When Do You Have A Case Against A Debt Buyer?”

Welding Rods Side Effects – Parkinson’s & Cancer

Welding Rod Side Effects Drug Toxic Chemicals

Free Case Evaluation From An Experienced Drug Liability Attorney.

Welding Rods Side Effects – Parkinson’s & Cancer

Welding Rods contain manganese, which is released into the air in fumes and dust when the rods are heated. Exposure to manganese fumes or dust for 2 months or more can cause Parkinson’s disease, or a similar condition called Manganism. The symptoms of Parkinson’s disease are:

Tremors or trembling in the hands, arms, legs, and face

Stiffness or rigidity in arms and legs

A fixed gaze or blank face

Slow body movements

Changed gait caused by abnormal muscle tone (dystonia)

Difficulty walking and with coordination and balance

Slurred or hesitant speech

Depression

Dementia

Suffered harm from Welding Rod exposure? You may have a lawsuit. Click here, for a top rated law firm to evaluate your legal rights.

Manganism can sometimes be reversed if caught in the early stages, but can’t be cured if it progresses to later stages. Anyone experiencing the early stages of the symptoms listed above should seek medical help immediately. Other warning signs include:

Inability to perform routine tasks as quickly as usual

Fatigue

Short-term memory loss

Insomnia

Headache

Muscle cramps

Loss of appetite

Anxiety

Diminished libido or impotence

“Locura manganica” (manganese madness), characterized by aggression and an inability to control emotions

Toxic doses of manganese sometimes cause immediate symptoms, including:

Dizziness

Nausea

Vomiting

Upset stomach

Dryness or irritation of nose, throat, and eyes

Fever

Chills

Body Aches

Metallic taste

Asthma-like symptoms

Other side effects of manganese inhalation or absorption include:

Bronchial asthma

Lung fibrosis

Pneumoconiosis or “siderosis”

Lung and nasal cancer

Ulceration or perforation of the nasal septum

Respiratory difficulty

Lung cancer

Anemia

The fumes and dust produced by heating welding rods produce other chemicals that are toxic in high levels and can cause serious side effects. For example both soluble chromium compounds and insoluble nickel are known to cause cancer in humans. Chromium dust can cause skin ulcers and eye burns. Both silicon and molybdenum fumes and dust can cause irritation to the respiratory system, eyes, and skin.

If you’ve been exposed to toxic fumes and dust from welding rods, you should see a heathcare provider to be checked for possible welding rods side effects. If you or a loved one has already been injured by the toxic effects of welding rods, you might be able to recover damages. You should have your case evaluated as soon as you can. See Welding Rods Attorney and Lawyer – How to Hire for information on finding a welding rods lawyer.

Check out the following articles for more information about Welding rods, filing a Welding rods lawsuit and finding a Welding rods attorney.

For more information about welding rods, see Drug Overview: Welding Rods Side Effects and Claims

To find out more about warnings, see Welding Rods Side Effects and Risks

For more information about welding rod updates, see Welding Rods Information and Warnings

If you would like to learn more about welding rods lawsuits, see Welding Rods Lawsuits, Litigation & Lawyers

To learn more about welding rods attorneys and how to find one, see Hiring a Welding Rods Attorney and Lawyer

Suffered harm from Welding Rod exposure? You may have a lawsuit. Click here, for a top rated law firm to evaluate your legal rights.

Read more for related video clips.

Continue reading “Welding Rods Side Effects – Parkinson’s & Cancer”

Welding Rods Overview: Side Effects and Risks

Welding Rods Drug Toxic Chemicals

Free Case Evaluation From An Experienced Drug Liability Attorney.

Welding Rods Overview: Side Effects and Risks

Welding rods or electrodes are pieces of metal used in the welding process to fuse other pieces of metal together. Welding rods and other materials used in the welding process, such as welding wire, contain dangerous levels of toxic chemicals that are released into the air as fumes and dust when the metal is heated. These toxins can enter the body through the respiratory system and absorption through the skin and eyes, creating serious welding rods side effects.

Suffered harm from Welding Rod exposure? You may have a lawsuit. Click here, for a top rated law firm to evaluate your legal rights.

The chemical element in these toxic fumes that has raised the most concern is manganese, but the fumes and dust contain other toxic elements as well, including aluminum, chromium, and nickel. Manganese is a naturally occurring chemical element found in the environment, often in groundwater and many kinds of rocks. In small amounts, manganese is an essential nutrient, needed for the healthy formation of bones and cartilage and for brain function. In larger amounts, manganese fumes and dust can cause serious damage to the central nervous system. See Welding Rod Side Effects – Parkinson’s & Cancer for information on the effects of manganese poisoning and the effects of other welding rod toxic products.

Check out the following articles for more information about Welding rods, filing a Welding rods lawsuit and finding a Welding rods attorney.

For more information about welding rods side effects, see Welding Rods Side Effects – Parkinson’s & Cancer

To find out more about warnings, see Welding Rods Side Effects and Risks

For more information about welding rod updates, see Welding Rods Information and Warnings

If you would like to learn more about welding rods lawsuits, see Welding Rods Lawsuits, Litigation & Lawyers

To learn more about welding rods attorneys and how to find one, see Hiring a Welding Rods Attorney and Lawyer

Suffered harm from Welding Rod exposure? You may have a lawsuit. Click here, for a top rated law firm to evaluate your legal rights.

Read more for related video clips.

Continue reading “Welding Rods Overview: Side Effects and Risks”